Tuesday, March 8, 2011

How To Clean Velvet Sofa

Notice to Mariners (22 ways to be).

notice to mariners.

A square of an integer can never end with a digit that is 2,3,7 or 8.
can only end with a digit that is 0,1,4,5,6,9.
other hand, considering the last two digits can end only in these ways:

00
01, 21, 41, 61, 81
04, 24, 44, 64, 84 25

16, 36, 56, 76, 96
09, 29, 49, 69, 89.

So if you see a whole number that ends in one of these 22 ways, is not a true square, beware!

Friday, February 18, 2011

Zoom Teeth Whitening Phuket Prices

footsteps of Fermat (anything from trinkets ........)

The theory numbers "are the integers 1,2,3 ,........ So here we will treat integers.
odd numbers divided by 4 to give the rest a rest or damage 3.
The primes> 2 are all odd, therefore, divided by 4 to give a rest (in this case are said to be of the form 4k + 1) rest or give 3 (are of the form 4k + 3).
Pierre De Fermat was the first to say that every prime of the form 4k + 1 can be written uniquely as the sum of two squares.
Examples: 17 = 1 2 + 4 2
13 = 2 2 + 3 2
29 = 2 2 + 5 2
41 = 4 2 + 5 2

(Instead, the numbers of the form 4k + 3, first or not first, you do not can never write as the sum of two squares, and this can be demonstrated in a simple manner).
Fermat This finding is fascinating because it is known that prime numbers can not be broken down into factors, but he has shown us the way to decompose a single prime number, which is not the factorization but it is the decomposition in the sum of two squares. What to say instead of the primes of the form 4k + 3?
For the moment I found a way to break down, similar to that shown by Fermat, not a prime number of the form 4k + 3, but the form 8k + 3.
and it is this: each prime type 8k + 3 can be written uniquely as the sum of a
squared plus twice a square (n = a
2 + 2b 2 ).
Esempi: 11 = 3 2 + 2 ·1 2
19 = 1 2 + 2 · 3 2
43 = 5 2 + 2 ·3 2
59 = 3 2 + 2 ·5 2

Per il momento custodisco la dimostrazione gelosamente per me (nessuno così si potrà impadronire in modo facile indebitamente del mio lavoro), ma vi invito a trovare un controesempio (può sempre darsi che io abbia sbagliato qualcosa senza accorgermene infatti, nessuno è perfetto), cioè un numero primo any of the form 8k + 3, which is not expressible uniquely as the sum of a squared plus twice a square.