10 ideas for a better future. 1) I believe that the Italian Constitution was written under the influence of some good fortune and believe that we must prevent any further change (or perhaps even that we should return to its original composition) . I think any change is made at the expense of our citizens, including quando fosse per ridurre il numero dei parlamentari (ridurre il loro stipendio penso che sarebbe la soluzione migliore). Vedi anche : http://stefanoulm.blogspot.com/2009/09/beppe-grillo-ha-raccolto-350.html
2) Nella complessità della vita societaria ogni riforma va a toccare una serie di equilibri già consolidati. Ogni riforma è come un'arma a doppio taglio, che risolvendo un problema ne va a toccare o creare un'altro. Essere coscienti di questo è il minimo che si richiede a un buon governante. E' come guidare un'auto su un'autostrada: non si richiede chissà quale evoluzione acrobatica, ma si richiede attenzione e che il guidatore sappia mantenere fermo the steering wheel and steering wheel control the minimum, which means ensuring that reforms are made, if necessary, but trying not to upset everything.
3) I believe that a body should be established for the safety and security on the roads and transportation in general (railways, trains). This body would include salaried engineers to test and continually what are the optimal conditions on the roads and on the job because you have the minimum number of deaths and disability and other institutions should have 's obligation to fulfill provisions of this organ, with no exceptions of any kind.
4) I believe that every citizen should have the following rights guaranteed the 5 vital, therefore, made available by the community, the State, without spending money for the have-nots: water, food, shelter, health care and education. This can also provide assistance by participating institutions, houses of hospitality and charity. The state should provide or ensure that each, individually, have guaranteed these rights (unless one does not waive any of these five rights to his choice).
5) I believe that instruments should be introduced, to be used with caution in order to test certainly an adventure, a recovery occurred to the company of a person detained. I think of priests, or people who volunteer to devote their entire lives, that we can do load testing, in well-defined and discrete forms, the real recovery a person detained. Obviously there is a risk of abuse, but we can not ignore the plight of people in prison has really turned back, and you can not ignore the fact that the prison (as well as a deterrent and as a precautionary measure) should be used to retrieve the subject and its not to unduly punish him. I also think of alternative protective measures as may be, for example a semi-freedom with a strong oversight (to man marking) in the hours of freedom of the subject. Everything should also serve to give an incentive to offenders because they really decide for their own repentance, so that people know that in society there is always the honest place. All this together with those additional or alternative measures other than imprisonment such as disqualification from public office for offenses committed in the administration of public affairs.
6) dismiss the money from the role of regulator of social life. Take it to the character of "absolute" that has come to possess. Of course, this is not a revolution in farsi.Tra easy for men there is a form set, which is the contractual form . The men lay down for the contract (ie a document in writing) the obligations, rights and reciprocal duties. You could start the pilot experiments in which a certain number of workers, a number of companies, a number of businesses, all eager to start this experiment, contracted what it is for each of them and what the obligations of each. For convenience, these contracts could also be in the form of money, in the sense that you would print a corresponding number to indicate in general terms a number of "acquired rights". Some may say that everything is useless, that there is already il denaro che è molto più comodo e maneggevole. Però in questo modo il denaro incomincerebbe a perdere quel valore assoluto che ora ha e quello che conta sarebbero i “contratti”, rinnovabili di volta in volta con modalità sempre nuove, in modo che le persone sarebbero sempre mantenute in contatto tra di loro dai “contratti”, in modo che ogni parte possa dire la sua su ciò che gli spetta. Insomma a farla da padrone così potrebbe essere un sodalizio di persone che si accordano di volta in volta e non l'impersonale “denaro”. Tutto ciò si può fare collegare con il discorso sulla “decrescita felice”, il cui principale promotore italiano è Maurizio Pallante. Vedi anche: http://stefanoulm.blogspot.com/2008/03/contracts-too-tight-to-mention.html
http://stefanoulm.blogspot.com/2010/02/levolversi- part-of-democracy-3.html
7) If a nation builds a dam on a river and that river on its way through several nations, those nations then crossed the river would see reduced the amount of ' Water that comes with everything that implies. This example to say that there is no concept of independence between the territories. The whole territory belongs to a whole world, and in this globalized world, every activity su un territorio finisce per influire su un altro territorio. Questo per dire che non esiste un territorio che appartiene esclusivamente a un popolo o a una nazione, sebbene evidentemente il popolo che lo abita ha più diritti degli altri su quel territorio, così come anche però ha più doveri su quel territorio. Ogni popolo che abita un territorio può essere pensato come un “custode” che ha diritto ad abitare quella casa, ma che ha anche il dovere di salvaguardare, di proteggere quella casa, che con più verità, appartiene alla mondialità, essendo tutte le dinamiche mondiali collegate le une con le altre. Il patrimonio vero di un popolo dovrebbe essere la sua cultura, la sua civiltà, i suoi valori, la sua jurisdiction, his science and his art instead of its territory . There are two extreme and opposite trends with regard to this point. One is the so-called "people Po" who would be the sole owner of Po land, instead of being the inhabitant and the legitimate guardian. The other trend is that of a part of Italian institutions that she would decide on the territory of the Susa Valley for high-speed trains, without the legitimate inhabitants to decide anything.
8) How do you conquer other nations? You win with weapons, with the occupation by force, by economic blackmail? Or do you conquer with the superior civilization, with culture more ? This should be reached this stage of human civilization, a truth of common heritage. There should be none, or ruler, or ordinary citizen, I can think of conquering another people by force and oppression rather than their own civilization and its culture better. And if their civilization and culture is really more than you can see by the lack of violence and arrogance. There are those who for their own personal development and character are brought to show their superiority by force and arrogance. They should instead show their superiority (if it is a real superiority) with a superior civilization (or more original works than works of social organization) and a higher culture.
9) travel to disarm. The race to disarm is twofold: to ensure a better future of peace (less energy, including intellectuals, is spent on weapons and more energy, including intellectuals, is spent for works of peace) and to ensure significant savings economic nations, with what cost armaments. The nations have to agree, must continue to do so (subject dear to Gorbachev) to establish a multilateral arms reduction, as a nation more difficult to operate a reduction of its weapons if other nations will do likewise. course, one must begin by nuclear weapons but not be limited only to those .
10) Introduction of a foreign policy once a very active and effective solidarity with other peoples, to all peoples, but especially to the underdeveloped peoples. To ensure other peoples real civil liberty and welfare, with total respect for the freedom of others and the culture of others, who is not a form of economic blackmail. As there is concern or regard for the fate of an Italian region poorly developed, so you have to worry or occupy sorti di una regione straniera poco sviluppata. Dire che uno straniero è diverso da un italiano è solo ipocrisia, per quanto chi non si preoccupa delle sorti dello straniero nemmeno si preoccupa delle sorti dell'italiano in difficoltà. Si dirà: non ci si può certo occupare dei popoli stranieri come ci si occupa delle regioni italiane poco sviluppate, se non mandando in bancarotta lo Stato Italiano. Intanto è per prima cosa questione di fissare un principio, che tutti i cittadini del mondo sono uguali, se non per ragioni soggettive e irrazionali di antipatia o di odio. In secondo luogo ci sono un sacco di spese inutili che si possono ridurre opportunamente o tagliare, prima fra tutte la spesa per gli armamenti, in modo da avere un fondo da destinare to global solidarity. That is also the most rational way to tackle immigration, doing something very tangible for other peoples , making sure that they did not need to run away from their land. It is sufficient that one nation in the world decides to allocate a substantial share of their wealth (wealth is not only economic but also intellectual, or spiritual energy) to trigger a call for global solidarity for solidarity among all other nations of the world. The other nations would soon be brought to emulate and exceed generosity in that nation which first had the courage to say too much, so that the rich world's generosity in spending would soon be recovered, because the solidarity among all nations would have the effect of making all nations a bit 'rich.