So the evolution of the state in its legislative form inevitably involves an evolving civil society. You can not think either of these things without the other. So here you have to much stress on civic education in schools, culture to be transmitted to people, rather than create laws to start serving a gaggle time for this occurrence, once for the other occurrences, such as buffer, with result of intricate yet more legislative jungle without going to the heart of the problem. A democracy or civil society that respects must be much more than a group of people that they will agree for the common-cost civil coexistence. It must be imbued with an idea of \u200b\u200bgenerosity and respect that goes beyond the simple convenience of town living. I know I have to respect a priori and not only because doing so would get my turn to your respect towards me. If not there is always the risk that a party of men, for their sole common convenience, may decide to waive an individual or another part of men whose existence is not a benefit, but an obstacle to the well-being Party men. One respect towards others and towards life in general if you must force itself to itself, there can be an ironclad rule logic that requires the respect of others beyond human convenience. There are people who sometimes "seems" to be a burden and not a benefit for the whole community, if you look at things from a point of view, maddeningly logical and rational. What kind of democracy or society can protect their lives if not a society that is sinking the reasons for his be-exist in a decidedly more mystical vision of the world and not only in a purely utilitarian existence? I believe that a person non-believer is to be respected like any other person, even I know from personal experience, what it means non-belief, but I believe that a non-believer always missing a more exact and concrete vision of existence in its deepest sense. Although the embryos and fetuses are part of that category of people (not yet formed) which at times can be considered a "burden" from other people who have the power to decide. If we go beyond a vision of simple and immediate convenience, we realize that being human is rooted right there in those embryos, which no man can kill a human embryo without suppressing simultaneously the very idea of \u200b\u200bthe dignity and 'man. You need a mystical vision of the world, a vision that goes just a little 'more than a strictly utilitarian, but a world view that belongs to deep roots of man, because every believer knows that faith is inherent to humans and human life, even in infancy is a law of God and not man!
That said I am for the secular state, because faith can not be imposed by force, otherwise would not be authentic, but taxation! (continued. .......)
0 comments:
Post a Comment